<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baidu vs Google: Side-by-Side Timeline of Design</title>
	<link>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/</link>
	<description>Blogging from Behind the Great Wall</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chinkerfly</title>
		<link>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14292</link>
		<author>Chinkerfly</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14292</guid>
					<description>Hahaha... it's funny and sad at the very same time.  What really scares me is that I know some really artistic Chinese people in web design but when it comes time to design a new page the first thing they do is go and get a screenshot of someone else's website who's done it before.  

Is it laziness?  At first glance all the copying seems like it might be for the sake of efficiency, but I've observed first hand that it actually takes More work, not less, to copy someone else's web design instead of starting from a blank slate.   So why do they do it?  

I have a theory that Chinese people copy because they have "4000 years of history" and at a certain point the general population threw up their hands and said everything good has already been done so time was better spent imitating the masters instead of challenging them.  I think it coincided with the time Confucius became all the rage.  Respect those ancestors and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha&#8230; it&#8217;s funny and sad at the very same time.  What really scares me is that I know some really artistic Chinese people in web design but when it comes time to design a new page the first thing they do is go and get a screenshot of someone else&#8217;s website who&#8217;s done it before.  </p>
<p>Is it laziness?  At first glance all the copying seems like it might be for the sake of efficiency, but I&#8217;ve observed first hand that it actually takes More work, not less, to copy someone else&#8217;s web design instead of starting from a blank slate.   So why do they do it?  </p>
<p>I have a theory that Chinese people copy because they have &#8220;4000 years of history&#8221; and at a certain point the general population threw up their hands and said everything good has already been done so time was better spent imitating the masters instead of challenging them.  I think it coincided with the time Confucius became all the rage.  Respect those ancestors and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14293</link>
		<author>Alex</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14293</guid>
					<description>And then there's the eye tracking study, showing mainland Chinese people find what they want faster and higher up with Google.

Both are established search engines.  There's no point marketing to one, even if it seems like a nice gimmick.  Bullshit does indeed baffle brains.

Google wins in an often overlook statistic - which search engine do higher income earners prefer, compared to incomeless students who go for Baidu far more.

In the end competition is good and Ask have the best English language results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then there&#8217;s the eye tracking study, showing mainland Chinese people find what they want faster and higher up with Google.</p>
<p>Both are established search engines.  There&#8217;s no point marketing to one, even if it seems like a nice gimmick.  Bullshit does indeed baffle brains.</p>
<p>Google wins in an often overlook statistic - which search engine do higher income earners prefer, compared to incomeless students who go for Baidu far more.</p>
<p>In the end competition is good and Ask have the best English language results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14294</link>
		<author>Rick</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14294</guid>
					<description>I don't mean to poop on Baidu, but this kinda stuff doesn't do much to dissuade me thinking their only advantage over google is mp3 search.

The Baidu Basics webinar thingy is tomw, so hopefully I'll be proven otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to poop on Baidu, but this kinda stuff doesn&#8217;t do much to dissuade me thinking their only advantage over google is mp3 search.</p>
<p>The Baidu Basics webinar thingy is tomw, so hopefully I&#8217;ll be proven otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinkerfly</title>
		<link>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14335</link>
		<author>Chinkerfly</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pandapassport.com/chinese-internet/baidu-vs-google-timeline/#comment-14335</guid>
					<description>When I was in the US the mp3 search function did not work.  Is that because they don't want people outside of China to see that they're enabling pirated music?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in the US the mp3 search function did not work.  Is that because they don&#8217;t want people outside of China to see that they&#8217;re enabling pirated music?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
